Sir Ian Blair QPM, MA, Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis Sir Ian Blair, 51 (d/o/b 19 March 1953) joined the Metropolitan Police in 1974 under the graduate entry scheme. His first posting was as a Police Constable in Soho.
My apologies to Sir Ian for taking this outrageous liberty. (Not any more, I haven’t had one from you)
But sometimes the little guy has to do something like this to get SERIOUSLY noticed. I have no intention of keeping this site for ever. Only until the matters I keep complaining about are INVESTIGATED. (or until you are sacked) Instead of being brushed aside by the incompetents he employs at Croydon Met Police. . . . Incompetents like Crime Manager Mark Stockford for instance, who was asked to look into the matter (but only because Croydon Constabulary were told to by The Directorate of Professional Standards MET Police Norbury) but did not have the wit to realise from the file who it is I’m complaining about. Obviously it was too much trouble to read the file properly.
Probably had another neighbourhood watch scheme to announce.
Let me be clear . . . Whilst some of my former complaints do involve those on the beat . . I do appreciate the difficult and sometimes hazardous job they do. . . . But when they COCK IT UP . . . It is up to the management to sort it out . . .. and not just DELIBERATELY IGNORE THE MATTER.
WELL THEY NOT GOING TO IGNORE IT ANY LONGER. . . . .Colin Clifford Cole
Ps . . . . London Fire Brigade Croydon also cocked it up. . . In almost exactly the same circumstances.
BUT . . . the difference is . . . .Borough Commander: DO Kevin Sexton . . . Immediately wrote a letter of profuse apology, rep remanded his men, and more importantly gave me his categorical assurance it would never happen again. . . .an attitude that is sadly lacking at Croydon Constabulary.
And they still can’t get it right. Because of my complaints Mark Stockford the Crime Manager “and member of the Senior Management Team working with Chief Superintendent Vicki Marr” reviewed the issues surrounding my complaint contained in my letter dated 29th January 2005” . . . . Supposedly.
He writes in his reply of the 30 March (two months later please note.) . “It is clear that your letter of complaint has been raised because you are not satisfied with the findings of the Ombudsman. Once again this is not an issue for police to investigate There are procedures for investigating failures on behalf of Local Authorities and these are designed to allow an independent viewpoint to be established. It would be an abuse of process were police to become involved in every case where a complainant to the Ombudsman, dissatisfied with the outcome of that enquiry”. .. . . SO IT’S THAT CLEAR IS IT MR STOCKFORD?
REALLY?
BUT . . . . . . Brian Miles The Local Government Ombudsman writes on 14 April 05 two weeks later
Dear Mr Cole . . . . Thank you for your facsimiles of 8 and 11 April 2005. I am just writing to confirm that I have asked the Council to make arrangements so I can interview relevant officers. I have given the Council my preferred date(s) for the interviews and I am keeping dates clear in my diary for late April and early May. I will write to you again in due course. . . . Brian Miles LGO
NO MR STOCKFORD . . . I’M NOT COMPLAINING ABOUT THE OMBUDSMAN AT ALL. WHAT’S CLEAR . . . . . IS THAT YOU MARK STOCKFORD DIDN’T BOTHER TO READ THE FILES. OTHERWISE YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT.
THE OMBUDSMAN is doing his job . . . He is INVESTIGATING the matter. . . . do you know what the word means Mr Stockford? It’s the sort of thing I have been doing for a year and a half now without one hundredth of your resources and yet have finally got Croydon Council to admit last month April 2005 that I was right all along. They just didn’t want to admit it . . . until they were forced to.
Brian Miles has now interviewed those concerned. He came down . . . all the way from Coventry (AGAIN). . . . .So what’s your excuse Mr Stockford? . . you only work round the corner. . . you can probably see the Council Building out of your office window.
It is that the same sort of dismissive arrogance of David Wechsler CEO Croydon Council that has put his Authority in the terrible mess they are now deservedly in. And If Croydon Constabulary keep this up they are going to go the same way.
Colin Clifford Cole . . . . AND IS WHY THE OMBUDSMAN FOUND CROYDON COUNCIL GUILTY OF MALADMINISTRATION. Sept 2005

Disclaimer . . I don’t know how Croydon MET Police treat other people but this is how they have treated me. Everything is true with letters to back it up.
The sarcastic notes are based on those truths and are not meant to imply the Met police always act that way.
Derek Conway MP Old Bexley & Sidcup writes. 29th November 04 “Dear Mr Cole. . . Systems can become monoliths and in this I find local Councils and the MET no less susceptible” & 8th March 2005 . . “Thank you for updating me on your admirable battle with bureaucracy. Croydon Council’s reluctance to grip this issue is remarkable.” Kind Regards Derek Conway TD MP . .
But look what’s happened to HIM in 2008
Croydon Council GUILTY of Maladministration found by Ombudsman. Sept 2005
Click here
Colin Cole’s sites are so popular that on a search “croydon council” 15/09/2005 MSN rate www.croydoncouncil.info 2nd only to LBC’s own site. . . . only one more place to go to No 1. Click here.
and on a search of ‘met police croydon’ MSN rate them 5, 6, & 7 PAGE 1 . . Click here
AND this site goes to No 1 . . Click here
A Search on MSN ‘daniel’s wanking page’ finds Dan J Ginsbury, Ptnr at Ingram Winter Green Solicitors (IWG) Islington claim the 1st 3 spots on page 1 out of 337 results. Top of the heap again Daniel Ginsbury. Just above Aunt Jennifer’s Spanking Page.
(I’ll have to look that one up)
Visit Local Government Ombudsman Watch , or L.G.O Watch the site that tells you the truth about this corrupt biased toothless lot who are supposed to oversee the Local Councils . . .
Click here http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org/
Read what the Law Society of England and Wales say about SPOOF SITES such as these
Click here.
Quote 24th July to IWG. . . . Colin Cole
“I will drive you off the web forever. . .you have my word on it, if you do not start acting properly reasonably and HONESTLY with me” . . . . and so on 25th September IWG slip down to 5th place in a straight fight
MSN search “IWG Solicitors”
This chap is doing the same to Moss & Coleman Solicitors Hornchurch Essex.
He calls them tossers.
My complaints against Croydon Constabulary include. Unlawful trespass, unlawful intimidation, unlawful removal of property, incompetent handling of situations, total and laughable overkill, waste of police time and resources, unlawfully ignoring the reporting of gun crime, total ignorance, misplacing material evidence, (losing it probably), failure to reply to letters and phone calls over and over and over again, failure to investigate racist hate crime, failure to mediate when asked to, ignorance of the law, ignorance of the Association of Chief Police Officer’s directives over racial crime, or more likely denial of it, Ignorance of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 Chapter 37 part 11, or more likely denial of it, failure to investigate racially motivated urine attacks, failure to investigate fraud, deception and incitement to racial hatred. . . . just to be going on with. I’ll probably think of some more later .
The whole story can be read on www.croydoncouncil.info The Story & on www.metpolicecroydon.co.uk Click on the pictures and be taken to the reality of policing in Croydon. . . . . and not the bullshit self congratulation site Croydon MET Police publish.
. . and this guy is having a go at “LEGAL BULLIES”
FDC Law, Solicitors.
Faulkner Daniel & Cruttwell Midsomer Norton . . . .featuring Catriona “Merciless” Duthie @ St John’s Chambers, Bristol
The Law Society’s incredible intervention, into spoof/parody sites is as noxious as the FA having a go at the News of the World for reporting a Football Player for snorting drugs. What The Law Society of England & Wales should do . . is exactly what the FA do . . . fine Solicitors who find themselves castigated on the web FOR BRINGING THE LAW PROFESSION INTO DISREPUTE . . . hang on a minute tho’ . . . . IS IT POSSIBLE TO BRING THE LAW MORE INTO DISREPUTE THAN THE LAW SOCIETY HAS DONE UP TO NOW? . . . . Click here Colin Clifford Cole.
YOU WANT TO TRESPASS ON SOMEONE ELSE’S PROPERTY IN CROYDON? . . DIAL 999 . . AND THE MET POLICE CROYDON WILL SEND A SQUAD CAR AND HELP YOU DO IT . . ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SAY IT’S YOURS . .
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
THIS IS WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR HAS TO SAY ABOUT THE DISGRACEFUL BEHAVIOUR OF HIS MET POLICE OFFICERS IN CROYDON . . “-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS SITE GOES TO No 1 Click here
Comment from da Silva family on the release of correspondence between Sir Ian Blair, the Home Office and the Metropolitan Police Authority.
We have been shown the letter sent by Sir Ian Blair to the Home Office within hours of the shooting of Jean Charles. We see he gave instructions that the IPCC should not be involved and would not be allowed into Stockwell station. Giovani da Silva said, “We can see that he felt completely free to act by himself. He prevented the IPCC from investigating Jean’s death as they should by law. And this he did at the very time when someone independent should have been at Stockwell tube recovering vital evidence. No wonder there is so much evidence missing. Giovani went on to say “These letters have shown that Ian Blair has lied once again – not only to my family but also to the British public”.
“Ian Blair has jumped the barrier of the law” said Giovani.
“We didn’t think we could be shocked any more at the way the police have behaved, but as a family we are” said Alex Pereira.
For further information and interview requests please contact The Menezes Family
Campaign on 07765707632
My case below is starting to look a bit tame compared to the above. But never mind it still needs to be said.
MET give whole new meaning to . . . “Getting a Brazilian”
Oct 2005 Amazing Discovery in Croydon. . . . . very rare document . . . appears to be genuine . . but is unfortunately not by The Master, Ceo Davido . . . but by a pupil of the same school. . .
En Panchoo . . .so is still worth something. . . Click here.
Have I Got News For Croydon
Have I Got News For Croydon
Disclaimer . . I don’t know how Croydon MET Police treat other people but this is how they have treated me. Everything is true with letters to back it up.
The sarcastic notes are based on those truths and are not meant to imply the Met police always act that way. My web sites exist in an attempt to get Met Police to do something unusual . . their jobs.
999 “NOT A MATTER FOR THE POLICE” . . . THIS PAGE
999 “NOT A MATTER FOR THE POLICE” . . . THIS PAGE
Marylebone & West End
Estate Agents KAY & Co
Go to Law Society’s Dirty Tricks Page.
In association with Richard Hegarty of Solicitors Hegarty & Co Peterborough
Instructing Matt Jacob of Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
The Small Print This site isn't connected with Private Eye in any way, all covers are copyright Private Eye (© 1961-2006).
All comments to idi@ugandandiscussions.co.uk.
The quality of the jokes on the covers may go down as well as up, your home is at risk if you don't keep up repayments.
NO MORE Mr NICE GUY
Figures published this week show Croydon Council is the second-worst authority in England and the worst in London . . . .
CROYDON COUNCIL are stunned into action by “worst Council for collecting taxes.”
No more Mr Nice Guy . . . LBC seize unpaid TAX’s from a retired widow “Smoker”. . . . . . amazing scenes click here.
VOTE Croydon Ratepayers against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk in MAY.
Help us get rid of The Labour Control in Croydon Council.
If you have a problem in Croydon that is the Council’s fault . . . Don’t waste your time complaining to Tony Newmam. . . Click here
Council and Democracy.
Croydon Council, Run by Labour Party councilors / councillors / that are perfectly happy to allow Council Officers to break the law, lie or otherwise act corruptly so long as they don’t have to do anything about it. They know how to ignore a problem. . If it’s yours.
The conspiracy of Silence
Picture right >> Tony Newman Leader of Croydon Council, picks up his allowance cheque from the Town Hall after they sack disabled workers from Crosfield.
See : . . . “There is some urgency, due to Croydon council’s current shameful drive to close the Crossfields centre – a factory with a large number of disabled workers – to save money” .
. Click here.
Scrooge Croydon Council cancel Christmas Dinner?. . . . Click here
Council leader Tony Newman says: "Croydon Council has no reason to apologise for closing Crosfield . . . . Click here.
Yes, we get a good service . . . .7.4% No, it's always set above inflation . . . 92.6%
Bit of a discrepancy there then Tony.!!!!!
Wanker Solicitors Ingram Winter Green are employed by
Green Leaf Management Ltd in association with Nat West Bank & Wilkins Kennedy Chartered Accountants.
So what have NatWest got in common with Unity Trust Bank?
They are both have dealings with Lying Solicitors IWG.
Click here
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BL
NatWest
116 Fenchurch Street
London
EC3M 5AL
Wilkins Kennedy
London Bridge
SE1 9QR

These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
MORE DIRTY TRICKS . . This time from IWG Solicitors. Because they can’t do anything about these sites by going to Court . . since that would mean going into a witness box and swearing under oath. They tried to close THIS site down by making complaint to my Hosting Co . . Click here.
More Dirty Tricks from Metcalfe, Copeman & Pettefar ( well extortion actually) You
always expect them to charge extortionate fees . . But you don’t expect them to actually
commit to extortion do you?
Click here.
Live the high life see what it’s like to be a Solicitor at MCP . . Click here
Colin’s new site . . . . www.mcp-law.org . . . . dedicated to the letters (or lack of them) from Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar Solicitors King’s Lynn, Peterborough, Thetford and Wisbech
MCP turn out to be just as big a bunch of wankers, liars and conspirators as Solicitors Ingram Winter Green. (IWG) Islington and Denniss Matthews, Islington and Anerley in the matter of the Sale/Purchase of 243 Portland Rd Croydon, SE 25 . . . (AND other matters)
Metcalfe, Copeman & Pettefar ‘s last chance to tell me the truth. . . . . Click here
Who wants to be on TV?
Are you a complainer? Do you believe we are entitled to good service? Do you think
complaining is a good way to get it? Are you the sort of person who would do a web
site like this if you were provoked enough?
A major independent TV company would
like to hear from you. The Development and Production Dept is looking for people
who stand up for their rights and are proud to cause a fuss.
Click Here.
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar
( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no
reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies,
connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews
conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have
declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have
and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity
to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.



At the End where we find . . . . YET MCP Law say their client’s Aunty and Uncle were
able to buy this property, through the patronage of plaintiff 1’s ‘fixer’ . . . .
without having to go through ANY of the above. . . . . . . what an INCREDIBLE story
. . . . . SWORN ON OATH TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. . . . by both plaintiffs and
MCP’s J Burton and presented to the Court by Sarah Adlam and her pet Barrister Matthew
Hutchings as FACT.
COLIN IS BACK . . . My sites have fallen by the wayside for a year while I was being sued unsuccessfully in the High Court of Justice . . . . Not for Defamation or Lible; because every word in them is true. . . but for Harassment under the 1997 Act. . . Trouble is . . One of MCP clients had to PERJURE himself to do it. With the assistance of MCP Law of course who had no right to be in the same Courtroom, even as a spectator, according to the rules, let alone prosecuting. There will be a tale to tell of Conspiracy to Defraud. Theft, Fraud, Conspiracy to Perjure, and just about every malpractice a Solicitor Sarah Adlam and Barrister Matthew Hutchings could manage.
The main reason my Police sites were reinstated is not to have a go at dear old Sir Ian . . . He’s got enough criticism out there without mine. It was because it became impossible to re-launch all my sites individually . . . . They are so intricately entwined.. BESIDES . . . It’s about time The Police started doing their JOB . . . ARRESTING CRIMINALS and PERJURERS and not making excuses NOT TO
BUT a clever and only reasonably determined detective, (or reporter) who actually wants to clear up such crimes as PERJURY with WRITTEN EVIDENCE, . . .none of this hearsay stuff . . . . TO cover up FRAUD, CONSPIRACY to DEFRAUD, THEFT . . . and very likely, MONEY LAUNDERING as well . . . . . . needing only a day or so to spare . Can follow the clues on my sites . . . . then answer the question at the end.
Why have I had to re-launch this site? . . . because after closing it down when I had no need to, in the honest belief that finally my complaints would be settled . . . FIFTEEN MONTHS ON . . . not only has it not been settled . . . . but every offer WE have made to do so . . AT THEIR REQUEST. . has been SUBSEQUENTLY ignored . . .
. . . . . . . and is still being ignored . . . That’s called . . . OPPRESSION by ABUSE of PROCESS.
And we never were going to get a settlement with MCP running the show. . . MCP to my Solicitor 11/05/07
“Additionally we would need some form of undertaking from your client in relation to him not re-instating the web-sites . . “ . . . WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INJUNCTION AT ALL . . It’s what THEY wanted to happen . . Piggy backing off their clients claim to suit THEMSELVES . . And Sarah Adlam knew that too . . . BECAUSE SHE WROTE IT.
Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust . . . .
23. Moreover, the Court will no doubt
generally be wary of any attempt to present as harassment, conduct which would more
aptly fit within the scheme of some other tort such as defamation, but which is not
available in itself as a cause of action for some reason (e.g. the statutory limitation
period). . . or because it’s TRUE
55. The early indications seem to be that the courts
are likely to seriously restrict the circumstances in which a claimant will be able
to use the 1997 Act to bring a claim which would otherwise fail.










CONSPIRATORS Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley and Islington have been very busy. They managed to close half my sites for a little while. . . So they are going to be hosted elsewhere from now on (as you can see). Denniss Matthews wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they took me to Court otherwise they would do so . . . so they threatened my hosting Co . . see Law Society Dirty Tricks page . . . . And of course my Letters to Denniss Matthews
Followers of my sites might have noticed that they have been down more than they have been up these last two weeks .May 2006 . . That is because since they were moved offshore to escape legal dirty tricks the servers have been under constant attack . . . Enough to destroy the hard drives. . . Can’t say who it is of course but it can’t be Ingram Winter Green or Denniss Matthews because they aren’t even clever enough to be Solicitors. . . However I’m told they know a man who is clever enough and he is the MD nscglobal CROOK Mohammed Yaseen who used to be MD before he went to prison. A Co that David Ingram of IWG, is also a Dir of. BUT is he the same Managing Director now at nscglobal/ltd under another but very similar name, Yaseen Khan as I am informed ? care to confirm or deny that any of you? Not so far they haven’t. Ans on the back of a mailbag to par84colin@hotmail.com


ROGUES GALLERY
PARTNERS IN CRIME
The CROOKS at MCP Law
On Scotland Yards own NOT official web site
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk
You want to catch a few criminal easy peasy Ian?
Here they are.
Conspiracy to Defraud Contrary to Common Law. You won’t even have to do the leg work
. . .it’s all here on my sites. Just follw the footsteps. Might be safer to stick
to asbos on Kids though. Locking Lawyers up is a bit tricky. You never know what
Lodge they’re in.
A gentleman like my self doesn’t like to disparage a lady. And whilst some of them
don’t actually deserve this treatment they are collectively responsible. . . Besides
I doubt any of them gave a moments thought to the hurt and damage the DELIBERATE
criminal behaviour of Rutter, Richardson, Burton and ADLAM . . caused my lovely
wife and kids over these past two years.