http://www.which.net/media/pr/jun04/which/solicitors.html
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-regulation isn't working. People complain to Which? time and again about the second rate service they receive from solicitors; often during stressful times. Other professions can't get away with this type of behaviour and it's time for the government to rein in this complaint-riddled industry."
Hear Hear
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-
http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-A-CLUEDO . The page that shows these people up for what they really are. A bunch of tossers
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.
To LGO Links & CouncilsNext Page >>>
http://www.geocities.com/profrogues/
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/freedom.htm
Let me expand on the 'English Law Society's' gagging attempts. We have Richard Hegarty, Chair of the Law Society's Compliance Board who we will now refer to as 'Dickie the Chair' who instructed Willoughby & Partners in London E14 9SG with a view to taking action against my hosting company. 'Dickie the Chair' rang me on the 6 Nov '03 trying to intimidate me with the comments I have put on this web site and according to Aman Virk, Manager, Quality & Service Standards at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors also Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, they both say 'Dickie the Chair' was acting on "Law Society business", what does this tell us? Well as 'Dickie the Chair' is acting with the approval of the members of the Law Society Board let me name some of them; Chief Executive of the Law Society (who replied to me on behalf of Peter Williamson) Janet Paraskeva; The President of the Law Society (who I have previously written to) Peter Williamson; Vice President Edward Nally; Deputy Vice President (who told me 'Dickie' "hadn't disappeared") Kevin Martin; July 2004 it's that time when the 'President' line all shove up one. I wonder if that includes 'Dickie the Chair'. As can be seen 'Freedom of Speech' when against the English Law Society is something that is hard to achieve, but then again with 'Ken' our Lord Mayor of London championing the cause, may be its time to send him a letter or an e-mail.
Big site . . this one has run for years . . . I first spotted it a year ago and it gave me the ideas to do my own sites. . . It certainly works . . when I was looking for a Solicitor . . and I only live round the corner . . . I did indeed avoid Thos Boyd Whyte as the site says. See also Law Society’s Dirty Tricks page http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page12.html . . . The bit about the Law Society acting against complainants leads us nicely on to . . .
http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page4.html
The point is Law Society . . that if there is defamation or harm to a Co caused by this. . . then it is
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.
Let me expand on the 'English Law Society's' gagging attempts. We have Richard Hegarty, Chair of the Law Society's Compliance Board who we will now refer to as 'Dickie the Chair' who instructed Willoughby & Partners in London E14 9SG with a view to taking action against my hosting company. 'Dickie the Chair' rang me on the 6 Nov '03 trying to intimidate me with the comments I have put on this web site and according to Aman Virk, Manager, Quality & Service Standards at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors also Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, they both say 'Dickie the Chair' was acting on "Law Society business", what does this tell us? Well as 'Dickie the Chair' is acting with the approval of the members of the Law Society Board let me name some of them; Chief Executive of the Law Society (who replied to me on behalf of Peter Williamson) Janet Paraskeva; The President of the Law Society (who I have previously written to) Peter Williamson; Vice President Edward Nally; Deputy Vice President (who told me 'Dickie' "hadn't disappeared") Kevin Martin; July 2004 it's that time when the 'President' line all shove up one. I wonder if that includes 'Dickie the Chair'. As can be seen 'Freedom of Speech' when against the English Law Society is something that is hard to achieve, but then again with 'Ken' our Lord Mayor of London championing the cause, may be its time to send him a letter or an e-
http://www.sir-
The point is Law Society . . that if there is defamation or harm to a Co caused by this. . . then it is
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.
http://www.hartjournals.co.uk/le/volumes/6/issues/2/457.html
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex
Self-regulation and discipline by the solicitor’s profession is in crisis. There is evidence of failure at all levels, from the efficient resolution of straightforward complaints, to ensuring the public is not exposed to dishonest solicitors. Changes by the Law Society in recent years have either failed to meet expectations or have diverted resources away from other problems. In this article I draw together a range of criticisms of the current approach to self-regulation and raise the question of whether or not the current regulatory model is sustainable. I will consider whether changes in the size and nature of the solicitors profession has resulted in the need for radical rethinking about the fundamental nature and structure of the regulatory system.
So it’s not just us that’s saying it. The Government know it’s true . . WHY DON’T THEY DO SOMETHING?
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex
Self-
http://www.parents4protest.co.uk/p4p/solicitors.htm
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
http://www.ca-la.org/html/lawyers.html
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA
CROYDON MET POLICE TWAT TEAM . . WATCH 5 OFFICERS in two squad cars RACE TO SEE A HOLE IN THE GROUND. . . on the basis of a lie. NO PROOF REQUIRED. Remarkable scenes.
CLICK HERE
CLICK HERE
Colin’s LINK pages . . . There is so much to look at out there . . . this is my attempt to assemble some good links about dodgey Solicitors . . The Corrupt Law Society. . . their stooges at The Legal Services Ombudsman . . . our lousy Local Authority Ombudman . . Lousy Met Policing . . and so much more . . . each link has a quote from that site . . My comments are in green.
My favourite quote is however from . . . . http://www.law-society.co.uk/ . . . . . . According to Mr Taranjeet Babra the Caseworker of the Law Society, quote "if a Solicitor has been negligent it does not mean he has given poor service"
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
except
Is it God’s little irony, that the acronym of The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors . is . TOSS’ors ??
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
except
Is it God’s little irony, that the acronym of The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors . is . TOSS’ors ??
To LGO Links & Councils Next Page >>>
LEGAL LINKS PAGE
Visit THE Croydon Council information site www.croydoncouncil.info
Ingram Winter Green are PART OF . . SUCCESSION London
Succession London brings together four partners who have considerable experience and expertise in facilitating the exit of business owners. We provide a one-stop shop that will assist the Business Link adviser.
Trinity Financial - specialised financial advice to the owner.
Unity Corporate Advisers @ Unity Trust Bank - advice on all stages of the buyout process.
Tossers Ingram Winter Green - advice on the most appropriate legal structure and tax issues.
Tower Hamlets CDA - project planning of ownership transfer and employee participation and productivity.
We are also linked to the Family Business Planning Unit of the Anglia Polytechnic University, which is part of their Centre for Business Transformation, and this provides a research input into the project.
Visit the Unity Trust Bank - Disgraced Berkeley Independent Advisers . . .Tossers Ingram Winter Green - Trinity Financial Ltd - - Tower Hamlets . . . connection. . . . . am I missing something here? . . What are TOWER HAMLETS and UNITY TRUST BANK, doing in bed with the likes of IWG and the poverty stricken BIA? . . . Click here.
It’s conclusion is . . . “Well that’s handy then . . . Tower Hamlets are funding the very people who are scamming off their Council Houses . . what a great idea”. . “Is that what they mean by “project planning of ownership transfer?” . . . Is this part of Labour’s Privatisation of Council stock?
DISCLAIMER . . Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar
( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
PARTNERS IN CRIME
The CROOKS at MCP Law
On Scotland Yards own NOT official web site
You want to catch a few criminals easy peasy Ian?
Here they are.
It’s THE UNCREDIBLES.
Watch Aunty and
Unc-
Visit
Barnett Ross the no deposit no identification Auctioneers. We will cross out the
contract and put another in it’s place.
NO SIGNATURES?????.
NO PROBLEM.
Telephone
bid but no form? Don’t despair we’ll fill it in for you.
Can’t set a price? We will
bid NO MAX for you. Barnett Ross makes sure YOU get the property you want. Barnett
Ross are just round the corner from Wankers IWG Solicitors. How convenient. Daniel
Ginsbury IWG’s “lying piece of pigshit” Solicitor recommends Barnett Ross at The
Radisson SAS Portman Hotel
Ridaco Developments Northern Ireland will buy your property UNSEEN . . . “NO Agent
will call to INSPECT” . . We pay 10% over Guide price even if the property is falling
down.
Fantastic Generosity.
If we don’t like our relatives will buy it off us.
Ridaco
Developments are clients of the CROOKS @ MCP Law
The Impropriety of
Sarah Adlam.
Click Here.
Let’s see you ignore this Law Society like you usually do.
SARAH (LIAR) ADLAM here . . . Deserves to be locked up (and might be yet) for what she did. Not only was she NOT ALLOWED to ACT in this matter. EVERYTHING she did was on behalf of herself and MCP LAW. . . . See the IMPROPRIETY of SARAH ADLAM and her pet barrister Matthew Hutchings. . . .Unlike Lisa Richardson below who was probably only doing what she was told . . . ADLAM must have sat down for hours planning skullduggery and PERJURY with her clients and Matthew Hutchings. . . and she wanted to charge ME £15,000 for it .
“ I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? . . . Click here
Granny Swindler Nathan Teitelbaum uses Barnett Ross Auctioneers at The Radisson SAS Portman Hotel. Wankers Ingram Winter Green Conveyancing.
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
Steven Grossman MRICS
sgrossman@barnettross.co.uk
Have a word with Steve about how to avoid filling in all
those nasty IDENTITY forms.
He’ll do them for you.
And make a name up for you too.
This chap is doing the same to Moss & Coleman Solicitors Hornchurch Essex.
He calls them tossers.
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors . . . But not from me.. . . Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB in 2006) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them. . In 2008 they are on their way out again . . Say bye bye to the Web IWG
CColin's Links 2 to Lousy Law Society, usless solicitors? and those fighting them on the web.